Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International islamic relief organization
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 02:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- International islamic relief organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Delete No notability proved by which it can be said that this organisation can be a separate encyclopedic article. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedydelete Already exists as International Islamic Relief Organization (IIRO) --JustaHulk (talk) 14:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]- There is no such speedy deletion criterion. Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. The correct action when one sees duplicate articles is to follow the procedure at Wikipedia:duplicate articles. Uncle G (talk) 14:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, point taken. Simple error, not "abuse". Thanks for the correction. --JustaHulk (talk) 14:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no such speedy deletion criterion. Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. The correct action when one sees duplicate articles is to follow the procedure at Wikipedia:duplicate articles. Uncle G (talk) 14:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. This is a duplicate article, making it not needed. STORMTRACKER 94 14:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to International Islamic Relief Organization. There is (unsourced) information here that may be useful to the article if anyone can source it, so it may be better to keep it in the history. Also, no reason not to have more Category:Redirects from other capitalisations -- people looking for information don't always get that right. Rigadoun (talk) 19:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.